getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Analysis of Dependencies of Checkpoint Cost and Checkpoint Interval of Fault Tolerant MPI Applications

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Mallikarjuna Shastry P.M.
  Author K. Venkatesh
JOURNAL:
  International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE), 2(8), 2690 - 2697.
YEAR: 2010
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): OPEN MPI, Fault Tolerance, Optimal Checkpoint Interval, Checkpoint Cost, Speedup, Efficiency.
DISCIPLINE: Computer Science
HTTP: http://www.enggjournals.com/ijcse/doc/IJCSE10-02-08-156.pdf
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-488-822 (Last edited on 2011/06/13 23:37:56 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
In this paper, we have analysed i) the relationship between the checkpoint cost and the optimal checkpoint interval and ii) the relationship between the checkpoint cost and the number of processors (processes) and we have also determined the optimal number of processors (processes) required for executing the fault tolerant MPI applications. We have presented an experimental study in which, we have used an optimal checkpoint restart model [1] with Weibull's and Exponential distributions to determine the optimal checkpoint interval. We have observed that, the optimal checkpoint intervals obtained using Weibull's distribution, produce minimal average completion time; as compared with the optimal checkpoint intervals obtained using Exponential distribution. The optimal checkpoint interval is approximately directly proportional to the checkpoint cost and inversely proportional to shape parameter. The study indicates that, the checkpoint cost of MPI applications increases with the number of processors (processes) used for execution. We have determined the optimal number of processes (processors) required to execute the MPI applications considered in this paper, as 4.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   1/96 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2013 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.