getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Grass-roots Justice in Ethiopia. The Contribution of Customary Dispute Resolution

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Associate Editor Pankhurst, Alula
  Associate Editor Assefa, Getatchew
PUBLISHER:
  CFEE  (Addis Abeba)
SERIES TITLE:
  Études éthiopiennes = Ethiopian studies, 4
YEAR: 2008
PUB TYPE: Book, Edited (ISBN 978-99944-808)
VOLUME/EDITION:
PAGES:
SUBJECT(S): None
DISCIPLINE: Anthropology/Archaeology
LC NUMBER: None
HTTP: http://www.cfee.cnrs.fr/spip.php?article101
LANGUAGE: None
PUB ID: 103-446-428 (Last edited on 2008/11/27 09:12:53 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
This book presents a timely review of the relations between the formal and customary justice systems in Ethiopia, and offers recommendations for legal reform. The book provides cases studies from all the Regions of Ethiopia based on field research on the workings of customary dispute resolution (CDR) institutions, their mandates, compositions, procedures and processes. The cases studies also document considerable unofficial linkages with the state judicial system, and consider the advantages as well as the limitations of customary institutions with respect to national and international law. The editors’ introduction reviews the history of state law and its relations with customary law, summarises the main findings by region as well as on inter-ethnic issues, and draws conclusions about social and legal structures, principles of organisation, cultural concepts and areas, and judicial processes. The introduction also addresses the questions of inclusion and exclusion on the basis of gerontocratic power, gender, age and marginalised status, and the gradual as well as remarkable recent transformations of CDR institutions. The editors’ conclusion reviews the characteristics, advantages and limitations of CDR institutions. A strong cased is made for greater recognition of customary systems and better alliance with state justice, while safeguarding individual and minority rights. The editors suggest that the current context of greater decentralisation opens up opportunities for practical collaboration between the systems by promoting legal pluralism and reform, thereby enhancing local level justice delivery. The editors conclude by proposing a range of options for more meaningful partnership for consideration by policy makers, the legal profession and other stakeholders.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 Chapters   1 
 Citations
  of Chapters   0 
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/340 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.