getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Recognition of Gene Acceptor Site via Ensemble Boosting

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Micor, Jose Rene L.
  Author Mojica, Elmer-Rico E. (University of the Philippines Los Banos)
  Author Pabico, Jaderick P. (University of the Philippines Los Banos)
CONFERENCE TITLE:
  10th Eurasia Conference on Chemical Sciences (EuAsC2S-10)
CONF. LOCATION: None
YEAR: 2008
PUB TYPE: Conference Paper
SUBJECT(S): exon; intron; ensemble; boosting
DISCIPLINE: Computer Science
HTTP: http://www.ics.uplb.edu.ph/node/251
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-444-173 (Last edited on 2008/10/20 06:11:51 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The complete identification of human genes involves determining subsequences that generate proteins (exons) and those that do not (introns). In RNA splicing, the problem of recognizing the gene acceptor site is concerned with the recognition of the boundaries between these regions, where the current procedure employed by researchers is the GU-AG rule: exon/GU-intron-AG/exon. However, the GU-AG motifs occur so frequently that a typical intron will contain several GUs and AGs within it, resulting in many false sites being recognized. This work investigates the use of a boosting ensemble of neural network classifiers for identification of gene acceptor sites in the human genome. A published dataset of primate exon-intron boundaries was used as a training set for the members of the ensemble to perform two recognition tasks: exon/intron boundaries (EI) and intron/exon boundaries (IE). The ensemble uses the boosting algorithm to pool each member’s output. The proposed boosting ensemble has been applied to recognize gene acceptor junctions of tumor suppressor genes p53 and BRCA1, and an artificial mRNA generated by a random function. The ensemble recognized 5%, 6%, and 11% fewer false sites for p53, BRCA1 and artificial mRNA, respectively, compared to that of the individual recognition by each member.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   1/90 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.