Automating the Classification of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Maturity Using Image Analysis and Neural Networks
|
 |
|
Post a Comment
|
 |
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTORS:
|
|
|
JOURNAL:
|
|
|
YEAR:
|
2007
|
|
PUB TYPE:
|
Journal Article
|
|
SUBJECT(S):
|
tomato grading; neural network; image processing; feed-forward; back-propagation
|
|
DISCIPLINE:
|
Engineering and Applied Sciences
|
|
HTTP:
|
http://www.ics.uplb.edu.ph/node/229
|
|
LANGUAGE:
|
English
|
|
PUB ID:
|
103-444-127
(Last edited on
2008/07/19 02:15:25 GMT-6)
|
|
SPONSOR(S):
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
Color in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) is the most important external characteristic to assess ripeness and postharvest life, and is a major factor in the consumer’s purchase decision. The degree of ripening is usually estimated visually by human graders comparing the tomato color to a chart that classify fresh tomatoes into six maturity stages according to the USDA standard classification: Green, Breakers, Turning, Pink, Light Red, and Red. This manual practice of tomato maturity classification often results into errors due to human subjectivitiy, visual stress, and tiredness. We developed a color image analysis procedure and a neural network model to automate the classification of tomato maturity. We captured using a computer-connected digital camera 6,000 color images of locally grown and harvested tomatoes equally representing the six maturity stages (1,000 each). The average classification by five expert graders from a local commercial farm was used as the maturity classification of each tomato. Using the red, green and blue (RGB) spectral values of the captured images as inputs, we trained a neural network-based tomato maturity classifier to indicate the degree of maturity within each stage and to provide a continuous index over the complete maturity range. We trained a 3-layer neural network via the feed-forward, back propagation training algorithm using 70% of the captured images as the training set (4,200 images) and 10% as the test set (600 images), equally representing each maturity stage. The test set was used during training to avoid model over-fitting. Validation results agreed with manual grading in 97% of the remaining tomatoes (1,200 images), while the remaining 3% were classified wrongly but within one maturity stage difference. With this result, an automatic vision system for tomato grading could be a potent alternative to manual grading.
|
|
|
|
STATISTICS
|
|
Click on # to view
|
|
Citations
|
|
0
|
|
References
|
|
0
|
|
Comments
|
|
0
|
|
Quality
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
Interest
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
View(er)s
|
|
1/82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prev |
Next |
|