getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Effect of some intercropping systems of garlic and onion with sugarbeet on their yields and associated nematode , Meloidogyne javanica

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Maareg, M.F. ; Sahar F. Tawfik and I.M.A. Goher
CONFERENCE TITLE:
  The third Conf. of Sustain. Agric. Develop. Fac. Of Agric., Fayoum Univ., 12-14 Nov. page 487-506
CONF. LOCATION: None
YEAR: 2007
PUB TYPE: Conference Paper
SUBJECT(S): Effect of some intercropping systems of garlic and onion with sugarbeet on their yields and associated nematode , Meloidogyne javanica
DISCIPLINE: Agricultural and Food Sciences
HTTP: http://www.freewebs.com/sugarbeet_ref_1
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-439-361 (Last edited on 2009/11/13 04:37:32 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Two field experiments were conducted in natural infested sandy soil with root-knot nematode , Meloidogyne javanica under sprinkler irrigation system at West Nubariya district during 2003 – 2004 and 2004- 2005 growing seasons to study the effect two intercropping systems of garlic and onion with sugarbeet on yield and yield components of garlic , onion and sugarbeet as well as Meloidogyne javanica , the root-knot nematode on sugarbeet . Land equivalent ratio ( L.E.R. ) , relative crowding coefficient ( K ) , aggressivity ( A ) and total income for sugarbeet where also calculated .The experimental design was randomized complete block design of four replications .The results obtained were summarized as follows :
1. The yield , yield components and quality characters ( sucrose , total soluble soled and purity ) as well as sugar yield of sugarbeet as soled crop recorded the highest values in ridges 120 cm width compared to in ridges 60 cm width in the two seasons .
2. Growing garlic as soled or intercrops in ridges 120 cm width have yield and yield components higher than that obtained by ridges 60 cm width in both seasons .
3. Yield and yield components of onion as solid crop or intercrop in ridges 60 cm width were higher than in ridges 120 cm width in both seasons .
4. Intercropping garlic or onion with sugarbeet in 120 cm ridges width gave the higher root yield , sugar yield , yield components and quality characters of sugarbeet than those of sole cropping and intercropping with onion or garlic in ridges 60 cm width .
5. The intercropping system of 120 cm width gave higher than 60 cm width Land Equivalent Ratio “L.E.R.” ( 2.03 , 2.01 for onion and 1.99 , 1.91 for garlic ) , Relative crowding coefficient “K” ( 11.84 , 14.70 for onion and 7.26 , 4.58 for garlic ) and total income ( 6806 , 6134 L.E. for garlic and 5432 , 5047 L.E. for onion ) in the first and second seasons , respectively .
6. Aggressivity ( A ) for sugarbeet was dominant with both intercropping systems , whearse was it dominated with onion and garlic in both seasons .
7. Garlic and / or onion intercropped at densities of 33 and 66 % with sugarbeet at 100 % density significantly ( P 0.05 ) lowered M. javanica , the root-knot nematode on sugarbeet as indicated by the number of nematode galls , eggmasses and final population density as well as multiplication factors compared to those on sugarbeet alone .The highest percentage reduction in the number of galls , eggmasses in root system and final population in soil as well as multiplication factors ( 45 , 52 , 64.8 % and 58.3 % respectively ) when garlic intercropped at density 66 % with sugarbeet in ridges 120 cm width .
It can be concluded that the intercropping system of ( 100% sugarbeet + 66 % garlic ) using ridges 120 cm width system did not only reduce nematode population , but also , enhanced the growth of sugarbeet and gave significantly higher yield or economic return than the other intercropping systems .
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/148 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.