Action Potentials and Representationality: Reply to Dr. Calì's Commentary
|
 |
|
Post a Comment
|
 |
|
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
We take note in our reply to Dr. Calì's useful and rich commentary of two issues: (1) We note that Koffka also rejected a dichotomy between the sensory and the motor systems; and relate Dr. Calì's observations to Peirce's conception of perception in terms of a repertoire of actions evoked by an object; James' ideo-motor theory; Prinz's ideo-motor action, Preston & de Waal's perception-action model; and Merleau-Ponty's work. (2) We also comment briefly on Dr. Calì's observations that the Gestaltists wanted to dispense with inner representations; and that an account of error may require a concept of representations (i.e., false representations).
|
|
|
|
STATISTICS
|
|
Click on # to view
|
|
Citations
|
|
1
|
|
References
|
|
6
|
|
Comments
|
|
0
|
|
Quality
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
Interest
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
View(er)s
|
|
2/90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prev |
Next |
|