getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Jevropejski sojus – “grad na cholmje” i Lisabonskaja strategija

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Tausch, Arno (University of Innsbruck)
JOURNAL:
  Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia (Institut mirovoi ekonomiki i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii (Rossiiskaia akademiia nauk)), 2007(3), 65 - 72.
YEAR: 2007
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): Economic integration
DISCIPLINE: Political Science
HTTP: http://www.imemo.ru/
LANGUAGE: Russian
PUB ID: 103-435-434 (Last edited on 2007/06/25 07:40:44 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The article, which appeared in Russia's leading international relations journal today, proposes a structuralist, dependency and world system-theory oriented ("CEPAL-ista") approach to the problems of the LISBON-process of the European Union. The article compares the relevance of the development thinking of the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America ("Globalizacion y Desarrollo", UN ECLA Santiago, 2002) with the neo-liberal models, currently prevailing at the level of the European Commission. The article empirically evaluates the success of the import-substitution strategies after 1945 in Western Europe with the current world-market oriented, neo-liberal development strategies, which in reality undermine the success of the Lisbon process, initiated in 2000 to catch up with America by the year 2010. European strategies, aimed at lowering the international comparative price level, and thus the price of non-tradables, especially government and social services, are doomed to failure, and are at the root of the European predicament. Europe should return to the industrial policy oriented strategies of the Delors Commission. The article presents a large number of empirical data, mostly from UN sources, to underline the presented arguments
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/226 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.