Choo (2008) Refuting the Security Claims of Mathuria and Jain (2005) Key Agreement Protocols

getCITED

Home Search Add Content Reports Help

Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations

Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Refuting the Security Claims of Mathuria and Jain (2005) Key Agreement Protocols

Post a Comment

CONTRIBUTORS:

Author:

Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond (Australian Institute of Criminology)

JOURNAL:

International Journal of Network Security, 7(1), 15 - 24.

YEAR:

2008

PUB TYPE:

Journal Article

SUBJECT(S):

None

DISCIPLINE:

Computer Science

HTTP:

http://ijns.femto.com.tw/download_paper.jsp?PaperID=IJNS-2006-06-21-2&PaperName=ijns-v7-n1/ijns-2008-v7-n1-p15-23.pdf

LANGUAGE:

English

PUB ID:

103-433-972 (Last edited on 2008/08/08 21:20:22 GMT-6)

SPONSOR(S):

ABSTRACT:
Despite the importance of proofs in assuring protocol implementers about the security properties of key establishment protocols, many protocol designers fail to provide any proof of security. Flaws detected long after the publication and/or implementation of protocols will erode the credibility of key establishment protocols. We examine the class of key agreement protocols (without proofs of security) due to Mathuria and Jain (2005). Using these protcols as case studies, we demonstrate previ- ously unpublished flaws in these protocols. We may speculate that such errors could have been found by protocol designers if proofs of security were to be constructed, and hope this work will encourage future protocol designers to provide proofs of security.

STATISTICS

Click on # to view
Citations		0
References		0
Comments		0
Quality		0/0.00
Interest		0/0.00
View(er)s		3/171

Quality
	N/A
High
	7
	6
	5
	4
	3
	2
	1
Low

Interest
	N/A
High
	7
	6
	5
	4
	3
	2
	1
Low

Prev | Next