getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Plausible Reasoning and the Resolution of Quantifier Scope Ambiguities

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Saba, Walid
JOURNAL:
  Studia Logica, 67(2), 271 - 289.
YEAR: 2001
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): natural language understanding, commonsense reasoning, quantifier scope
DISCIPLINE: Computer Science
HTTP: http://www.springerlink.com/content/pj63203273173428/?p=840907a2030b4217b9ec59ee868aa6d2&pi=5
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-432-962 (Last edited on 2007/02/22 12:19:38 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Despite overwhelming evidence suggesting that quantifier scope is a phenomenon that must be treated at the pragmatic level, most computational treatments of scope ambiguities have thus far been a collection of syntactically motivated preference rules. This might be in part due to the prevailing wisdom that a commonsense inferencing strategy would require the storage of and reasoning with a vast amount of background knowledge. In this paper we hope to demonstrate that the challenge in developing a commonsense inferencing strategy is in the discovery of the relevant commonsense data and in a proper formulation of the inferencing strategy itself, and that a massive amount of background knowledge is not always required. In particular, we present a very effective procedure for resolving quantifier scope ambiguities at the pragmatic level using simple quantitative data that is readily available in most database environments.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/97 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.