getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Key Agreement from Signatures: Improved Protocols and Anonymous Extension

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Chow, Sherman S.M.
  Author Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond (Australian Institute of Criminology)
INSTITUTION ID:
  IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
SERIES:
 
YEAR: 2007
PUB TYPE: Report
REPORT NUMBER: 018
PAGES:
SUBJECT(S): None
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: http://eprint.iacr.org/2007/018
LANGUAGE: None
PUB ID: 103-432-625 (Last edited on 2007/02/02 20:48:03 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
We exploit the relationships between signature schemes and key agreement protocols; and propose a high performance identity-based (ID-based) key agreement protocol based on strong pairing challenge-response signatures. The latter is the first of its kind in ID-based cryptography and is of interest in itself. Using the proof technique of signature unforgeability against adaptive chosen-message attack, our protocol fully supports Session-Key Reveal queries and partially supports Session-State Reveal queries (which leaks ephemeral secret and keying material for session key derivation), without gap assumption or any unrealistic restriction. We show how to incorporate KGC forward secrecy so the past session keys are not compromised even the adversary gets the master secret key of the Key Generation Center (and the private keys of all users). Both proposals are efficient and have the strongest security among other unbroken identity-based two-party two-message protocols. Inspired by ring signatures and motivated by the need for a better anonymous roaming mechanism, we extend our basic protocol to support key agreement among spontaneous anonymous groups (SAG). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ID-based SAG key agreement protocol with bilateral privacy.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/98 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.