getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Formal Analysis of Secure Contracting Protocol for E-Tendering

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author DU, RONG
  Author FOO, ERNEST
  Author BOYD, COLIN
  Author CHOO, KIM-KWANG RAYMOND (Australian Institute of Criminology)
  Editor Rei Safavi-Naini
  Editor Chris Steketee
  Editor Willy Susilo
PROCEEDINGS TITLE:
  ACSW Frontiers 2006 - Fourth Australasian Information Security Workshop - AISW-NetSec 2006 ( Volume 54 - ACSW Frontiers 2004 of the ACS Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology (CRPIT) series)
YEAR: 2006
PUB TYPE: Conference Paper in Proceedings
PAGES: 155 - 164
SUBJECT(S): None
DISCIPLINE: Computer Science
HTTP: http://crpit.com/Vol54.html
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-429-549 (Last edited on 2006/08/24 17:51:09 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Formal specification and verification of protocols have been credited for uncovering protocol flaws; revealing inadequacies in protocol design of the Initial Stage and Negotiation Stage; and proved that improved protocol performs in the desired manner while under modelled attacks from dishonest players. It also shows how formal methods can be used by protocol designer to achieve a better design of a complex system. Formal methods can also populate an abstract concept with a more complete and consistent protocol specification. Complex system protocol can be easily specified with simplifying assumptions for a high level of protocol verification. This set of assumptions can then be used to further explore the protocol. Using formal methods for complex secure system protocol design will provide not only better quality protocol but could also be the first step in advancing an abstract concept to a more practical stage for development.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   1 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/202 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.