getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Nieder, A
JOURNAL:
  Journal of comparative physiology, 188(??), 249 - 260.
YEAR: 2002
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): Visual perception, Perceptual completion, Subjective contours, Figure-ground segregation, Second-order contours, Single-unit responses
DISCIPLINE: Psychology
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-422-626 (Last edited on 2005/12/29 06:18:39 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
This review article illustrates that mammals, birds and insects are able to perceive illusory contours. Illusory contours lack a physical counterpart, but monkeys, cats, owls and bees perceive them as if they were real borders. In all of these species, a neural correlate for such perceptual completion phenomena has been described. The robustness of neuronal responses and the abundance of cells argue that such neurons might indeed represent a neural correlate for illusory contour percep- tion. The internal state of an animal subject (i.e.,alert and behaving) seems to be an important factor when correlating neural activity with perceptual phenomena. The fact that the neural network necessary for illusory contour perception has been found in relatively early visual brain areas in all tested animals suggests that bottom-up processing is largely sufficient to explain such perceptual abilities. However,recent findings in monkeys indicate that feedback loops within the visual system may provide additional modulation. The detection of illusory contours by independently evolved visual systems argues that processing of edges in the absence of contrast gradients reflects fundamental visual constraints and not just an artifact of visual processing.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References   3 
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/279 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.