Caught Between Political Engineering and Diplomacy? Challenging demands for Election Observation in Africa - The Case of founding elections in Nigeria and Madagascar
|
 |
|
Post a Comment
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTORS:
|
|
|
JOURNAL:
|
|
|
YEAR:
|
2004
|
|
PUB TYPE:
|
Journal Article
|
|
SUBJECT(S):
|
election observation; democratization; aid; Madagascar; Nigeria
|
|
DISCIPLINE:
|
No discipline assigned
|
|
HTTP:
|
|
|
LANGUAGE:
|
None
|
|
PUB ID:
|
103-418-270
(Last edited on
2005/08/04 02:12:36 GMT-6)
|
|
SPONSOR(S):
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
International election observation has become a valuable means of supporting African democratic polity. Notably, EU observer missions adopting a professional approach are meant to shield against political pressures from partisan stakeholder interests. However, this growing professionalism did not necessarily lead to less biased observation results. Available evidence suggests that in crucial cases, the origin and orientation of the bias changed from ‘diplomatic’ to ‘technocratic’. The latter can be as least as damaging to the declared aims of election observation as the former. Two outstanding examples, the observation of transitional elections in Nigeria and Madagascar, will serve to illustrate this hypothesis and its consequences for the necessary reorientation of election observation methodology.
|
|
|
|
STATISTICS
|
|
Click on # to view
|
|
Citations
|
|
2
|
|
References
|
|
4
|
|
Comments
|
|
0
|
|
Quality
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
Interest
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
View(er)s
|
|
3/223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prev |
Next |
|