getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

The Three Amigos: The Role of Actor-Networks, Boundary Objects and Strategic Uncertainties in the Rise and Fall of Three Innovations in a Single Company

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Emsley, D
INSTITUTION ID:
  University of New South Wales  (Sydney)
SERIES TITLE:
  School of Accounting Seminar Series
YEAR: 2004
PUB TYPE: Working Paper/Manuscript
WORKING PAPER NUMBER: None
PAGES: 1,  39 p.
SUBJECT(S): management accounting, actor-network theory, boundary objects, strategic uncertainty, community of interest, community of practice
DISCIPLINE: Economics
HTTP: http://www.accounting.unsw.edu.au/Docs/seminars2004_s2/paper03.pdf
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-410-194 (Last edited on 2004/11/29 04:27:14 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
This study reports on attempts to introduce management accounting innovations over a two year period in several plants at a manufacturing site of a multinational company. The study follows the efforts of three individuals (the amigos) to introduce different management accounting innovations at three different plants on the site. Although two of the attempts “failed”, one innovation was “successful” to the extent that efforts were subsequently made to introduce it into two other plants. Consequently, five stories account for the different outcomes that can best be explained using a theoretical framework that combines actor-network theory, boundary objects and strategic uncertainties. In a number of ways this study complements previous research by Briers and Chua (2001) who also used actor-network theory and boundary objects to explain the process of innovation but, importantly, this paper also introduces Simons (1990) notion of strategic uncertainties to explain how different boundary objects wax and wane in importance over time, along with the networks attached to them.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References   1 
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/446 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.