getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Affect as an aspect of workload: Why and how to address affect in automation and simulation studies.

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Ganey, H. C. Neil
  Author Murphy, Lauren M.
  Author Dalton, Joseph
  Author Koltko-Rivera, Mark E. (Professional Services Group, Incorporated)
  Author Hancock, P. A. (MIT2 Lab, University of Central Florida)
PROCEEDINGS TITLE:
  Human performance, situation awareness and automation: Current research and trends, Volume 1
YEAR: 2004
PUB TYPE: Conference Paper in Proceedings
PAGES: 249 - 252
SUBJECT(S): Human Factors Psychology; Individual Differences; Affect; Mental Workload; Simulation; Mood; Performance
DISCIPLINE: Psychology
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-407-487 (Last edited on 2005/07/28 07:07:39 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Affect is a much-neglected moderator of workload and performance. Research literature demonstrating affect's influence on cognitive and physical tasks is summarized. In terms of cognitive performance, affect has been shown to influence memory function, decision making, problem solving, risk assessment, and performance on other cognitively loaded tasks. In terms of physical performance, affect has been shown to influence physical perceptions and interpersonal functioning, and to moderate performance on tasks that are heavily loaded for strenuous phyiscal activity. Methodological suggestions are given regarding induction of affect in experimental studies, and assessment of affect. This paper presents the research in human performance, automation, and simulation with several resources: a rationale for including affect in the conceptualization of every study; a list of studies that demonstrate affect's role in moderating cognitive and physical performance; references to theoretical models for affect, performance, and workload; references for induction of affect; references for assessment of affect.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/142 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.