Comparison of Four Measures of Values: Their Relative Usefulness in Graduate Education Advisement
|
 |
|
Post a Comment
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTORS:
|
|
|
JOURNAL:
|
North American Journal of Psychology,
6(2),
205 -
218.
|
|
|
|
YEAR:
|
2004
|
|
PUB TYPE:
|
Journal Article
|
|
SUBJECT(S):
|
values, educational advisement, counseling psychology,
|
|
DISCIPLINE:
|
Psychology
|
|
HTTP:
|
|
|
LANGUAGE:
|
None
|
|
PUB ID:
|
103-401-487
(Last edited on
2007/06/02 15:17:05 GMT-6)
|
|
SPONSOR(S):
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
Data were collected from 134 deans and directors of graduate programs in six disciplines (business administration, fine arts, political science, social work, divinity, and chemistry and physics) regarding the ideal value profile of a candidate for the focal graduate degree. The value categories of four measures of values (the Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values [SOV], the Rokeach Value Survey--Terminal [RVS-T], the Rokeach Value Survey--Instrumental [RVS-I], and the Schwartz Value Survey [SVS] were compared in terms of inter-rater agreement. Whereas the RVS-T, RVS-I, and SVS yielded relatively generic profiles of ideal students (i.e., the ssme values were generally associated with graduate work in all six fields) the SOV yielded a different profile for each field. For five out of the six fields, the a priori value profile was confirmed using the SOV.
|
|
|
|
STATISTICS
|
|
Click on # to view
|
|
Citations
|
|
0
|
|
References
|
|
0
|
|
Comments
|
|
0
|
|
Quality
|
|
1/6.00
|
|
Interest
|
|
1/5.00
|
|
View(er)s
|
|
3/305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prev |
Next |
|