getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

A call for action to support best practices in evaluation of comprehensive tobacco control evaluation strategies

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Manske, Steve
  Author Maule, Catherine
  Author O'Connor, Shawn
  Author Lovato, Chris
  Author Harvey, Dexter
INSTITUTION ID:
  Population and Public Health Branch, Heatlh Canada
SERIES:
  Chronic Diseases in Canada
YEAR: 2003
PUB TYPE: Report
REPORT NUMBER: 24(1)
PAGES:
SUBJECT(S): best practices; comprehensive tobacco control; evidence-based medicine; prevention and control; program evaluation; smoking
DISCIPLINE: Medicine
HTTP: http://www.health.gc.ca/pphb-dgspsp/publicat/cdic-mcc/24-1/e_e.html
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-401-222 (Last edited on 2004/04/02 06:49:26 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The National Tobacco Control Best Practices Working Group convened a two-day workshop to support best practices in evaluation of comprehensive tobacco control strategies. A Better Practices Model, aimed at developing a self-correcting system for best practices, guided the workshop content and process. Organizers intended to identify a common surveillance and monitoring framework for tobacco control strategies in Canada by first building strong working relationships between 43 decision-makers, practitioners and researchers from 12 Canadian jurisdictions. Participants identified needs and recommendations related to increased understanding and use of uniform evaluation strategies, building capacity, and recognition of the complexity of the task of evaluating comprehensive tobacco control strategies. The workshop highlighted the need for increased communication to facilitate understanding across the different sectors of participants. It also identified the potential benefits of harmonization in evaluation of tobacco control strategies across jurisdictions. Priority actions include forming a national team to agree on a model for evaluation, conducting an environmental scan for indicators, planning evaluation/monitoring and research agendas and determining roles for various stakeholders.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References   1 
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/356 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.