getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

A survey of usability evaluation in virtual environments: classification and comparison of methods

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Bowman, Doug A.
  Author Gabbard, Joseph L.
  Author Hix, Deborah
JOURNAL:
  Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments , 11(4), 404 - 424.
YEAR: 2002
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): Virtual Environments; evaluation; Telepresence
DISCIPLINE: Computer Science
HTTP: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=638102
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-397-133 (Last edited on 2003/11/24 07:08:48 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Virtual environments (VEs) are a relatively new type of human-computer interface in which users perceive and act in a three-dimensional world. The designers of such systems cannot rely solely on design guidelines for traditional two-dimensional interfaces, so usability evaluation is crucial for VEs. This paper presents an overview of VE usability evaluation to organize and critically analyze diverse work from this field. First, we discuss some of the issues that differentiate VE usability evaluation from evaluation of traditional user interfaces such as GUIs. We also present a review of some VE evaluation methods currently in use, and discuss a simple classification space for VE usability evaluation methods. This classification space provides a structured means for comparing evaluation methods according to three key characteristics: involvement of representative users, context of evaluation, and types of results produced. Finally, to illustrate these concepts, we compare two existing evaluation approaches: testbed evaluation (Bowman, Johnson, & Hodges, 1999) and sequential evaluation (Gabbard, Hix, & Swan, 1999).
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References   1 
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/473 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.