Comparison of Return on Effort and Conventional Expectancy Theory Predictions of Work Effort and Job Performance: Results from Three Field Studies
|
 |
|
Post a Comment
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTORS:
|
|
|
PROCEEDINGS TITLE:
|
|
|
YEAR:
|
1986
|
|
PUB TYPE:
|
Conference Paper in Proceedings
|
|
PAGES:
|
269 -
271
|
|
SUBJECT(S):
|
expectancy theory, return on effort (ROE) version of expectancy theory
|
|
DISCIPLINE:
|
Psychology
|
|
HTTP:
|
|
|
LANGUAGE:
|
English
|
|
PUB ID:
|
103-392-257
(Last edited on
2003/07/10 15:40:41 GMT-6)
|
|
SPONSOR(S):
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
It was predicted that a return on effort (ROE) version of expectancy theory would yield superior predictions of work effort and job performance in comparison to the conventional approach. Examining data from three field studies, the present research found only modest support.
|
|
|
|
STATISTICS
|
|
Click on # to view
|
|
Citations
|
|
0
|
|
References
|
|
0
|
|
Comments
|
|
0
|
|
Quality
|
|
1/6.00
|
|
Interest
|
|
1/5.00
|
|
View(er)s
|
|
1/240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prev |
Next |
|