getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Metaphor, symbolic play, and logical thought in early childhood

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Seitz, Jay A. (City University of New York (CUNY) York College)
JOURNAL:
  Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 123(4), 373 - 391.
YEAR: 1997
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): metaphor, symbolic play, operativity, Piaget, logical thought, visual and verbal media
DISCIPLINE: Psychology
HTTP: http://www.york.cuny.edu/~seitz/bio.html
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-385-906 (Last edited on 2003/01/02 12:46:05 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The development of the ability to understand diverse types of metaphor was examined in terms of prior play context (symbolic vs. constructive object play), Piagetian operational level (preoperational vs. concrete-operational), and medium of presentation (pictures vs. words). Forty 4-year-olds and 80 6-year-olds (40 preoperational, 40 concrete-operational) were presented with six different types of metaphorical relationships (color, shape, physiognomic, cross-modal, psychological-physical, and taxonomic matches) in both pictures and words in a match-to-sample design. Results indicated that (1) constructive object play, rather than symbolic play, facilitated the understanding of perceptual and taxonomic metaphor suggesting differences in early styles of metaphoric usage, (2) despite previous findings the study failed to replicate a relationship between operativity and metaphoric understanding, and (3) younger children did significantly better in the pictorial medium suggesting a picture superiority effect for more perceptible metaphorical relations (perceptual and physiognomic) whereas older children showed a word superiority effect for more conceptual metaphors (psychological-physical and taxonomic).
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   1/530 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.