getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

A notational analysis of elite tennis strategy

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author O'Donoghue, P.
  Author Ingram, B.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), 19(2), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 2001
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): TENNIS; EVALUATION; NOTATION; STRATEGY; ELITE-ATHLETE; SEX-FACTOR; SURFACE; COMPARATIVE-STUDY
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-808 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:58 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
A notational analysis of singles events at all four Grand Slam tournaments between 1997 and 1999 was conducted to determine the influence of the sex of the player and court surface on elite tennis strategy. Rallies of 7.1 +/- 2.0 s in women's singles were significantly longer than those in men's singles (5.2 +/- 1.8 s; P < 0.001). Rallies of 6.3 +/- 1.8 s at the Australian Open, 7.7 +/- 1.7 s at the French Open, 4.3 +/- 1.6 s at Wimbledon and 5.8 +/- 1.9 s at the US Open were recorded. Rallies were significantly longer at the French Open than at any other tournament (P < 0.05) and significantly shorter at Wimbledon than at any other tournament (P < 0.05). In women's singles, 52.8 +/- 12.4 % of points were baseline rallies, significantly more than in men's singles (28.6 +/- 19 %; P < 0.001). The proportion of baseline rallies played at the French Open (51.9 +/- 14.2 % of points) was significantly greater than at the Australian Open (46.6 +/- 12.5 %), Wimbledon (19.7 +/- 19.4 %) and the US Open (35.4 +/- 19.5 %; P < 0.05). The results show that both the sex of the player and surface of the court have a significant influence on the nature of singles tennis at Grand Slam tournaments.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   1 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/532 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.