getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Correlates of simulated hill climb cycling performance

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Davison, R. C. R. (Napier University)
  Author Swan, D.
  Author Coleman, D.
  Author Bird, S.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), 18(2), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 2000
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): CYCLING; LACTATE; AEROBIC-CAPACITY; CADENCE; WINGATE-ANAEROBIC-TEST; ERGOMETRY; TREADMILL; COMPARATIVE-STUDY; HILL-CLIMBING
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-719 (Last edited on 2007/10/10 12:54:20 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between several commonly used aerobic and anaerobic cycle ergometer tests and performance during a treadmill cycling hill climb. Eight competitive cyclists (age 27 +/- 7 years; body mass 73.2 +/- 5.2 kg; height 177 +/- 6 cm; mean +/- s) completed six tests in random order: a lactate minimum test, a Wingate anaerobic power test; and two 6-km climbs at 6 % and two 1-km climbs at 12 % gradient performed on a motorized treadmill. The mean times and power outputs for the 6-km climbs at and 1-km climbs were 16:30 +/- 1: 08 min:s and 330 +/- 17.8 W, and 4:19 +/- 0:27 min:s and 411 +/- 24.4 W, respectively. The best individual predictor of 6-km and 1-km performance times was the time for the corresponding climb at the other distance (r = 0.97). The next strongest predictor of both hill climb performances was the average power produced during the Wingate test divided by body mass. Stepwise regression analysis showed that the two variables contributing most to the prediction equation for both climbs were the Wingate average power per unit of body mass and maximal aerobic power divided by total mass (rider + bike), which together accounted for 92 and 96 % of the variability in the 6-km and 1-km climbs. In conclusion, among competitive cyclists, the Wingate average power per unit of body mass was the best single predictor of simulated cycling hill climb performance at the distance and gradient used.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/415 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.