getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Nutritional practices of athletes: are they sub-optimal?

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Hawley, J. A.
  Author Dennis, S. C.
  Author Lindsay, F. H.
  Author Noakes, T. D.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), 13(Special Issue), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 1995
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): REVIEW; MAN; WOMAN; ATHLETE; MARATHON; TRACK-AND-FIELD; NUTRITION; HABIT; DIETARY-CARBOHYDRATE
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-466 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:45:01 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Athletes' nutritional needs are principally determined by their training load (the intensity times frequency times duration of daily workouts) and body mass. Analyses of the diets of track and field competitors and marathon runners reveal a macronutrient composition similar to that of weight-matched, inactive individuals. Male athletes generally ingest adequate dietary energy to meet their daily energy expenditure and all vitamin and mineral needs. However, the energy intake of most female athletes is less than might be anticipated based on their training load. As a result, intakes of iron, calcium, vitamin B12 and zinc are often below the recommended daily allowances. Compared with the recommendations of sports nutritionists and exercise physiologists, the majority of athletes consume a diet which might be considered significantly deficient in carbohydrate (CHO). Although there is currently little scientific support for increasing the proportion of daily energy intake from CHO above the 45-55 percent (equivalent 5 g kg BM-1day-1) chronically consumed by most athletes, such a regimen would probably improve an athlete's training capacity, especially when rapid recovery from intense activity is required.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   1/362 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.