Influence of aerobic versus anaerobic exercise on the relationship between reproductive hormones in men
|
 |
|
Post a Comment
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTORS:
|
|
|
JOURNAL:
|
|
|
YEAR:
|
1995
|
|
PUB TYPE:
|
Journal Article
|
|
SUBJECT(S):
|
AEROBIC-TRAINING; ANAEROBIC-TRAINING; MAN; PROLACTIN; FSH; TESTOSTERONE; LH; HYDROCORTISONE
|
|
DISCIPLINE:
|
No discipline assigned
|
|
HTTP:
|
|
|
LANGUAGE:
|
English
|
|
PUB ID:
|
103-366-465
(Last edited on
2002/02/27 18:45:01 US/Mountain)
|
|
SPONSOR(S):
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
This study examined the effects of equal anaerobic and aerobic total work outputs on the relationship between reproductive hormones in men. Nine subjects performed three randomized trials on separate days: (1) 1 h period of rest (control), (2) 1 h continuous aerobic exercise (65 percent VO2max), and (3) 1 h intermittent anaerobic exercise (which included 2 min exercise periods at 110 percent VO2 max). The total work output of the aerobic and anaerobic trials were equated. For the 8 h after each experimental trial, blood samples were collected hourly and analysed for testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin and cortisol. Diet, physical activity and circadian influences were all controlled. Compared with the control, the aerobic and anaerobic trials significantly elevated testosterone, prolactin and cortisol; however, these changes were transient and returned to control levels within 1-2 h of recovery. Neither exercise produced significant changes from control for LH and FSH. The area under the hormonal response curves (AUC) was calculated for the 8-h recovery period. The testosterone and LH AUC results did not differ among the trials (the FSH AUC was not calculated). The prolactin AUC for the anaerobic trial was greater than both the control and aerobic trials, but the aerobic and control trials did not differ from one another. Correlation analysis among the AUC results within each trial showed testosterone and LH to be significantly related during the control (r=0.723, P less than 0.05) and aerobic (r=0.801, P less than 0.01) trials, but not so during the anaerobic trial (r = 0.430, P greater than 0.05). No other significant correlations were found. The present findings suggest the relationship between testosterone and LH is affected by anerobic exercise but not aerobic exercise. However, the effect of anaerobic exercise upon the testosterone-LH relationship did not seem related to the concurrently induced prolactin or cortisol changes. Anaerobic exercise may produce some degree of temporary alteration within the testosterone-LH component of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis however, the mechanism for this phenomenon remains unclear.
|
|
|
|
STATISTICS
|
|
Click on # to view
|
|
Citations
|
|
0
|
|
References
|
|
0
|
|
Comments
|
|
0
|
|
Quality
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
Interest
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
View(er)s
|
|
1/1884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prev |
Next |
|