getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Examining warm-up decrement as a function of interpolated open and closed motor tasks: implications for practice strategies

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Anshel, M. H.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), 13(3), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 1995
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): TENNIS; LEARNING; SKILL; GROUNDSTROKE; AROUSAL; WARM-UP
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-449 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:45:01 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Warm-up decrement (WUD) is a loss in the level of physical performance following rest and prior to subsequent trials. The activity-set hypothesis is one of several explanations for this phenomenon. The purposes of this study were to field test the efficacy of the activity-set hypothesis and explore the effectiveness of performing closed and open interpolated tasks in reducing WUD. The criterion task was hitting tennis ground strokes in response to a ball tossing machine, an open skill. Elite players (n=20) from a tennis club in New South Wales, Australia, practised either a closed or open task, or rested, prior to resuming the first post-test trial, using a repeated-measures design. The results yielded partial support of the activity-set hypothesis. Although the closed interpolated task markedly reduced WUD, open skill practice solicited better post-rest performance. Warm-up decrement was clearly evident under the rest condition. Furthermore, post-rest scores were statistically superior for the open skill condition as compared to practising a closed interpolated task, at least for the first two post-rest trials (trials 21 and 22). The implications for these results in reducing WUD are explored within the frameworks of task classification systems and schema theory.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/450 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.