getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Ventilatory threshold and work efficiency during exercise on a cycle and rowing ergometer

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Bunc, V.
  Author Leso, J.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), 11(1), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 1993
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): BICYCLE-ERGOMETRY; ROWING-ERGOMETRY; COMPARATIVE-STUDY; RUNNING; ELITE-ATHLETE; TEST-RELIABILITY
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-359 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:45:01 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of increasing specific (rowing ergometer) and non-specific (cycle ergometer) workloads on parameters relating to the ventilatory threshold (Tvent) and work efficiency. When highly trained male rowers were tested using non-specific workloads, their percent VO2max values at Tvent were close to those characteristic of untrained subjects (74.6 plus/minus 6.2 VO2max). However, when we tested the same subjects using specific workloads, we recorded values typical of highly trained athletes (85.0 plus/minus 4.4 percent VO2max). For the non-specific exercise on the cycle ergometer, we recorded work efficiency values close to those of untrained subjects (22.8 plus 2.1 percent), however, for the specific exercise on the rowing ergometer, we recorded much lower values (16.4 plus/minus 3.1 percent). Because of the results of the non-specific submaximal exercise tests, we suggest caution in the interpretation of physiological variables that may be sensitive to training status. The evaluation of Tvent and work efficiency as supplementary parameters during laboratory studies will enable researchers to ascertain the effectiveness of the training process used, as well as indicating the specificity of the loading apparatus.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/327 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.