getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Leger, L. A.
  Author Mercier, D.
  Author Gadoury, C.
  Author Lambert, J.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), 6(2), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 1988
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): PHYSICAL-FITNESS; TESTING; CHILD; ADULT; TEST-RELIABILITY; ATHLETE; COMPARATIVE-STUDY; AEROBIC-CAPACITY; FIELD-TEST
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-266 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:45:02 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
A maximal multistage 20 m shuttle run test was designed to determine the maximal aerobic power of school children, healthy adults attending fitness class and athletes performing in sports with frequent stops and starts (e.g. basketball, fencing and so on). Subjects run back and forth on a 20 m course and must touch the 20 m line; at the smae time a sound signal is emitted from a starting speed of 8.5 km per h. When the subject can no longer follow the pace, the last stage number announced is used to predict maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) from the speed corresponding to that stage and age. To obtain this regression, the test was performed individually. Right upon termination VO2 was measured with four 20 s samples and VO2 max was estimated by retroextrapolating the O2 recovery curve at time zero of recovery. For adults, similar measurements indicated that the same equation could be used keeping age constant at 18. Test-retest reliability coefficients were 0.89 for children (139 boys and grils 6-16 years old) and 0.95 for adults (81 men and woman, 20-45 years old). Normal data are also available for schoolchildren and adults and estimated VO2 max were found comparable to other tests and/or populations.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      1/5.00 
 Interest      1/6.00 
 View(er)s   9/1182 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.