getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Anthropometric and body build variables as discriminators of event participation in elite adolescent male track and field athletes

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Housh, T. J.
  Author Thorland, W. E.
  Author Johnson, G. O.
  Author Tharp, G. D.
  Author Cisar, C. J.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), ??( 2), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 1984
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): ANTHROPOMETRY; BODY-COMPOSITION; TRACK-AND-FIELD; RUNNING; SPRINTING; HURDLE-RACE; JUMPING-EVENT; THROWING-EVENT; PARTICIPATION; MAN; ELITE-ATHLETE; ADOLESCENT; APTITUDE; SELECTION
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-214 (Last edited on 2004/02/22 15:29:45 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which anthropometric and body build measures discriminated between elite adolescent male athletes competing in different track and field events. One hundred and six national-level Junior Olympic male athletes volunteered as subjects. The sample included 26 middle distance runners, 24 sprinters/hurdlers, 39 jumpers and 17 throwers. The body build variables measured included fat-free body weight/height, the sum of 6 skinfolds, the sum of 12 diameters, the sum of 11 circumferences, biacromial diameter/bi-iliac diameter and the bidimensional somatotype rating components X (ectomorphic rating - endomorphic rating) and Y [twice the mesomorphic rating - (endomorphic plus ectomorphic rating)]. Multiple discriminant analysis revealed three significant discriminant functions (DF1, DF2, DF3). Validation of the discriminant functions revealed an overall value of 76.8 percent of subjects correctly classified. Based on these results it was apparent that anthropometric and body build variables discriminated between adolescent male track and field competitors in different events. However, the variables most responsible for these between-event differences were dependent upon which events were being compared.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   4/782 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.