getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

V02 max and training indices as determinants of competitive running performance

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Foster, C.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), ??( 1), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 1983
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): TRACK-AND-FIELD; RUNNING; AEROBIC-CAPACITY; TRAINING-LOAD; ELITE-ATHLETE; MAN; UPHILL; TREADMILL; TESTING
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-195 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:45:05 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The importance of the maximal oxygen uptake (V02 max) for competitive running performance is established. Although of clear importance, the quantitative association between the volume and intensity of training, and running performance has not been established. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the relative importance of V02 max, training volume (miles/week) and intensity for running performance at distances ranging from 1.0 to 26.2 miles. Seventy-eight well-trained runners of widely varying ability were studied during uphill treadmill running to determine V02 max. They provided training records to determine training volume and intensity, and participated in races of 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 6.0, 10.0 and 26.2 miles. The relationship of V02 max and training volume and intensity to performance was determined using multiple regression. Performance (running time) was highly correlated with V02 max. The addition of training measures improved the multiple correlations in some but not all events. However, even when addition of one or both training indices improved the multiple correlation, the net reduction in the standard error of estimate was small. The results imply that the volume and intensity of training, per se, are relatively minor determinants of cross-sectional differences in competitive running performance.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/941 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.