getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Indirect assessment of thoracic fluid balance following maximal exercise in man

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Buono, M. J.
  Author Wilmore, J. H. (Texas A&M University College Station)
  Author Roby, F. B.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sports Sciences (JSS), ??( 1), ?? - ??.
YEAR: 1983
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): THORAX; BODY-FLUID; RESIDUAL-VOLUME; VITAL-CAPACITY; LUNG; EXERCISE; PULMONARY-EDEMA; TESTING; TREADMILL; MAN; NON-ATHLETE; BLOOD-VOLUME
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP:
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-366-194 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:45:05 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
A series of three studies was conducted to help determine the physiological mechanism responsible for the previously reported increase in residual volume following maximal exercise. Study I showed that in 18 male volunteers, residual volume and total lung capacity were significantly increased over the pre-exercise values through 30 and 15 min of recovery, respectively. Transthoracic electrical impedance was significantly decreased below the pre-exercise value through 15 min of recovery. This suggests that there was an increase in intrathoracic fluid following exercise. By experimentally manipulating central blood volume via G-suit inflation and venous occlusion, study II showed that post-exercise residual volume was relatively insensitive to increases in intravascular fluid within the thorax. Study III showed that the post-exercise diffusion capacity was unchanged following exercise, despite an increase in the post-exercise heart rate. It was concluded that a subclinical pulmonary oedema is present following maximal exercise. A logical sequence of events was proposed as a possible explanation for the response of residual volume following exercise.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/696 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.