Examination of the relationship between true halo and halo error in performance ratings
|
 |
|
Post a Comment
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTORS:
|
|
|
JOURNAL:
|
|
|
YEAR:
|
1997
|
|
PUB TYPE:
|
Journal Article
|
|
SUBJECT(S):
|
Tests-and-scales-Administration; Performance-evaluation
|
|
DISCIPLINE:
|
No discipline assigned
|
|
HTTP:
|
|
|
LANGUAGE:
|
English
|
|
PUB ID:
|
103-361-448
(Last edited on
2002/02/27 18:44:49 US/Mountain)
|
|
SPONSOR(S):
|
|
|
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to test competing theories regarding the relationship between true halo (actual dimensional correlations) and halo rater error (effects of raters' general impressions on specific ratee qualities) at both the individual and group level of analysis. Consistent with the prevailing general impression model of halo rater error, results at both the individual and group level analyses indicated a null (vs. positive or negative) true halo-halo rater error relationship. Results support the ideas that (a) the influence of raters' general impressions is homogeneous across rating dimensions despite wide variability in levels of true halo; (b) in assigning ratings, raters rely both on recalled observations of actual ratee behaviors and on general impressions of ratees in assigning dimensional ratings; and (c) these 2 processes occur independently of one another.
|
|
|
|
STATISTICS
|
|
Click on # to view
|
|
Citations
|
|
0
|
|
References
|
|
1
|
|
Comments
|
|
0
|
|
Quality
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
Interest
|
|
0/0.00
|
|
View(er)s
|
|
1/682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prev |
Next |
|