getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Development of the Power in Sport Questionnaire

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Wann, D. L. (Murray State University)
  Author Metcalf, L. A.
  Author Brewer, K.
  Author Whiteside, H. D.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 23(4), 423 - 443.
YEAR: 2000
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): Sport; Power; Measurement; Instrumentation; Design; Evaluation; Questionnaire; Coach; Referee; Umpire; Officiating
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=S-665559&title=S-665559
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-669 (Last edited on 2002/05/26 16:58:55 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Sport officials, coaches, and players possess power to the extent that they have the ability to influence or change the attitudes or behaviors of others. French and Raven (1959) identified five different sources of interpersonal power that have relevance for sport settings: reward, coercive, referent, legitimate, and expert power. The current investigation was designed to develop a psychometrically sound instrument for use in assessing these bases of power (labeled the Power in Sport Questionnaire, PSQ) and to use the instrument to examine the power of sport coaches and officials. Two forms of the PSQ were constructed. Form PSQ-O (other) involved perceptions of the power of others while the PSQ-S (self) involved perceptions of one's own power. In the first study, data were collected from college varsity and college intramural athletes, coaches, and officials. The results revealed that both forms of the PSQ were internally consistent, reliable, contained construct validity; and contained the appropriate five factors. A second study documented the criterion validity of the instrument. Discussion centers on comparisons of PSQ-O and PSQ-S scores.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   7/537 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.