getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

A two-stage evaluation of a sport psychology internship

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Weigand, D. A. (De Montfort University (Bedford))
  Author Richardson, P. A.
  Author Weinberg, R. S. (Miami University of Ohio)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 22(1), 83 - 104.
YEAR: 1999
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): psychology; internship; program; evaluation; university; case-study; questionnaire; interview
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=S-23306&title=S-23306
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-639 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:14 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to conduct a two-stage program evaluation of a season-long sport psychology internship. Stage one utilized quantitative and qualitative questionnaire responses of American NCAA Division I women's basketball athletes and their coach who had a sport psychology intern as part of the coaching staff. Stage two consisted of follow-up personal, standardized interviews (two months postseason) with the coach and selected athletes (one with a receptive and one with a less receptive reaction to the role of the intern). Four substantive areas were addressed including consultant's effectiveness, the types and use of mental skills, rapport with the consultant, and an overall evaluation of the internship program. Results of the quantitative analyses suggested the consultant was perceived as effective and having excellent rapport with the athletes and the coach. Content analysis of the qualitative aspects of the questionnaire as well as the postseason interviews revealed several suggestions for a more effective internship. Results are discussed in terms of the effectiveness of the two-stage process for the evaluation of a sport psychology internship.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/405 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.