getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Picturing success: photographs and stereotyping in men's collegiate basketball

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Johnson, D. L.
  Author Hallinan, C. J. (Victoria University)
  Author Westerfield, R. C.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 22(1), 45 - 53.
YEAR: 1999
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): basketball; man; university; photography; success; perception; race; comparative-study
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=S-23303&title=S-23303
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-621 (Last edited on 2006/02/16 14:04:17 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
This study investigated the use of photos to ascertain the level of belief that certain attributes contribute to success in men's collegiate basketball. Four population groups were represented. Subjects were asked to rate their level of belief that eight specific factors contributed to the success of pictured male athletes. Significant differences were found for the four population groups utilized. Subjects perceived success for a Black athlete to be the result of innate athletic abilities: natural quickness and speed, natural jumping ability, longer limbs, and extra muscle tissue. Success for a White athlete was viewed as resulting from hard work, leadership ability, access to better coaching, and access to better equipment and facilities. Scores for an Hispanic athlete reflected a lack of athletic identity or stereotype. The composite athlete's success was seen as resulting from a combination of the factors attributed to the Black athlete and the White athlete. The results support the "stereotyping theory" of positional stacking reported in collegiate and professional sports. Implications for participation patterns of young athletes are also discussed.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/220 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.