getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Re-examining coping among basketball referees following stressful events: implications for coping interventions

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Anshel, M. H.
  Author Weinberg, R. S. (Miami University of Ohio)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 22(2), 141 - 161.
YEAR: 1999
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): basketball; officiating; referee; coping-behaviour; stress; survey; comparative-study; Australia; United-States
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=S-46695&title=S-46695
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-601 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:14 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to examine the coping styles, designated as approach and avoidance, of 137 skilled basketball referees from the U.S. (n = 75) and Australia (n = 62). Using a self-report survey, the referees were asked to indicate their use of coping techniques - thoughts and actions - in response to each of 14 acute stressors. The strategies were then categorized into approach and avoidance coping styles by deductive content analysis methods. Two sets of chi-square analyses were conducted, one comparing the frequency of using approach and avoidance coping styles for all referees, and a second analysis comparing the coping styles of U.S. and Australian basketball referees. Results of chi-square analyses indicated significant differences between coping styles as a function of the type of stressor and between American and Austalian referees in the use of approach and avoidance coping styles. The results, supporting the transactional model of coping, suggest a need for continued examination of coping style and cultural differences among sports officials, with implictions for enhancing coping intervention effectiveness.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   5/439 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.