getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

The presentation of human biological diversity in sport and exercise science textbooks: the example of 'race'

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Hallinan, C. J. (Victoria University)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 17(1), 3 - 15.
YEAR: 1994
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): content-analysis; sport; race; theory; classification; review
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=346414&title=346414
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-471 (Last edited on 2006/02/16 16:26:56 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The 'race' concept has become an institutionalized feature of contemporary legal, occupational, and academic settings. In the academic realm, the concept has often been used by textbook authors who seek to readily classify human population. This study examined definitions within selected sport/exercise science textbooks. Such operational definitions were examined in light of the extensive evidence from physical anthropology and biology which proposes that 'race' is an inappropriate typological construct for describing human physical diversity. A total of 32 textbooks from the subdisciplines of biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor development, motor learning, and measurement and evaluation were studied using content analysis methodology. Analysis revealed that textbook authors who utilize the concept as an organismic variable do so contra to the extensive anthropological research irrespective of whether 'race' is used as a categorical variable or organismic variable. As such, its utilization in either form naturalizes embedded biases and is antiscientific. It is suggested that sport science in this area would be better served by incorporating anthropology, history, and sociology.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/377 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.