getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

The relationship of task and ego orientation to performance-cognitive content, affect, and attributions in bowling

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Newton, M.
  Author Duda, J. L. (University of Birmingham)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 16(4), 209 - 220.
YEAR: 1993
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): tenpin-bowling; goals; attribution; ego
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=343829&title=343829
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-456 (Last edited on 2007/11/19 20:21:38 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship of individual differences in goal orientation to mid-activity cognitive content and affect and post-performance attributions across three games of bowling. Forty-seven undergraduate students enrolled in bowling activity classes were recruited as subjects and asked to play a standard 10-frame bowling game in a learning-focused environment on three different days. The subjects' dispositional proneness toward task and ego involvement was measured by the Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire. Cognitive content, affect, and performance attributions were assessed by a self-report questionnaire. The results suggested that the students' cognitive and affective patterns during and following performance tended to vary as a function of the goal perspective. Task orientation negatively correlated with performance worry (Game 2) and positively related to enjoyment (Game 3). Ego orientation correlated negatively with strategy formulation (Game 3). For Game 1, task orientation positively correlated with the perception that effort most impacted performance, while ego orientation correlated positively with the belief that ability most influenced performance. Future research directions and the practical significance of the results are discussed.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   2 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   9/549 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.