getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Effect of goal difficulty on performance of aerobic, anaerobic and power tasks in laboratory and field settings

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Bar-Eli, M. (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)
  Author Levy-Kolker, N.
  Author Tenenbaum, G. (Florida State University)
  Author Weinberg, R. S. (Miami University of Ohio)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 16(1), 17 - 32.
YEAR: 1993
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): goals; goal-setting; skill; sport
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=305045&title=305045
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-443 (Last edited on 2002/06/15 15:16:57 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The present investigation examined the effect of goal difficulty on performance of aerobic, anaerobic and power tasks in both laboratory and field settings. Male subjects (n=104) performed the tasks of hill run, horizontal bar, parallel bars, rope-climbing, 3000 m run, obstacle course and dynamometer grip, whereas female subjects (n=80) performed the tasks of hill run, rope-hanging, situps, 2000 m run, obstacle course, and dynamometer grip. All subjects were given pre and post questionnaires assessing goal acceptance, goal commitment, effort and goal difficulty. Subjects were matched on baseline performance and randomly assigned into four experimental groups ("easy", "moderate", "hard", and "very hard" goal difficulty levels), and two control groups ("do" and "do your best" conditions). Results revealed that performance scores on all physical tasks did not vary among all experimental conditions and controls. In addition, questionnaires revealed few significant differences between males and females relating to the setting of goals. However, it was found that more than 50 percent of subjects in the control conditions spontaneously set goals for themselves. Results are discussed in terms of the goal attainability assumption, intrinsic motivation, and psychological gender differences. Future research directions are recommended in terms of potential mediating variables. In addition, more longitudinal designs are encouraged.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   5/469 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.