getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Why young wrestlers "Hang Up" their singlet: an exploratory investigation comparing two models of sport attrition

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Burton, D. (University of Idaho)
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 15(3), 209 - 226.
YEAR: 1992
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): wrestling; participation; attrition; drop-out; constraint
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=304377&title=304377
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-423 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:13 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The primary purpose of this exploratory investigation was to examine the viability of employing two motivational models, Nicholls' "perceived ability" model and Crandall's "expectancy-value" model, to investigate attrition in sport. Eighty-three wrestling "participants" and 26 "dropouts" responded to a questionnaire assessing theoretical predictions from both models. Results confirmed that each model accurately discriminated between participants and dropouts, although the Crandall model correctly classified participants and dropouts slightly more accurately than did Nicholls model. The variables that best discriminated between participants and dropouts for the Crandall model were wrestling importance, parental dropout constraints, future expectancies, parents' minimal standard, and academic importance, whereas for the Nicholls' model, the most discriminating variables were future expectancies and enjoyment. Results are discussed in terms of the congruence between theoretical predictions and empirical findings for both models and the implications of these findings for future attrition research.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/289 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.