getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

A computer simulation of sport officiating behavior

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Rainey, D. W.
  Author Larsen, J. D.
  Author Williard, M. J.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 10(4), 183 - 191.
YEAR: 1987
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): baseball; umpire; visual-perception; computer; simulation; comparative-study; self-efficacy
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=212566&title=212566
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-343 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:13 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Twenty male baseball umpires and 20 male nonumpires participated in a visual discrimination task which simulated calling balls and strikes. Participants called 96 pitches presented on a computer display and rated their certainty for each call. Pitches were displayed at three speeds and in four different types of locations: clearly in, on the line, just out, and clearly out. Three-way analysis of variance (groups x location x speed) indicated that umpires and nonumpires did not differ in accuracy on this task. Both groups were most accurate judging pitches clearly in and clearly out and least accurate for pitches on the line. Speed of pitches was significantly, but minimally, related to accuracy for both groups. However, umpires were significantly more certain of their calls than nonumpires when the pitches were just outside the strike zone of their greater experience at making public judgements, their belief that the task was similar to real umpiring, or their belief that they should project confidence in their role as umpires. These results were interpreted in the context of Bandura's self-efficacy model. Male baseball umpires (n=20) and nonumpires (n=20) participate in a visual discrimination task which simulates calling balls and strikes. Participants call 96 pitches presented on a computer display, and rate their certainty for each call. Pitches are displayed at three speeds and in four different types of locations: clearly in, on the line, just out, and clearly out. Three-way analysis of variance groups x location x speed) indicates that umpires and nonumpires do not differ in accuracy. Umpires are significantly more certain of their calls than nonumpires when the pitches are just outside the strike zone or on the line. Interprets the results in the context of Bandura's self-efficacy model.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/253 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.