getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

The effects of specific vs nonspecific mental preparation strategies on strength and endurance performance

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Weinberg, R.
  Author Jackson, A.
  Author Seaboune, T.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 7(4), 175 - 180.
YEAR: 1985
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): imagery; arousal; psyching; mental-training; visualization; method; comparative-study
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=177473&title=177473
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-314 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:12 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of the present study was to determine if imagery, preparatory arousal (specific) or "psych-up" (nonspecific) instructions most facilitated performance on a variety of muscular strength and endurance measures. Twenty-five male volunteer subjects utilized the three mental preparation strategies and a control condition on four different physical performance tasks (one minute sit-ups, push-ups, pull ups, standing long jump) at four different testing periods throughout the semester in a within subjects design. For example, a subject might use imagery on all four tasks during the first testing session, preparatory arousal the next session, psych-up the third, and control the fourth. The order of presentation was counter-balanced to reduce the changes of an order effect. Subjects were given 30-seconds just prior to their performance to employ their technique. Results indicated that for all four tasks the experimental groups performed significantly better than the control group. However, no differences were found between any of the mental preparation conditions. Results are discussed in terms of the mental preparation and cognitive intervention literature, and future directions for research are offered.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   4/262 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.