getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Psychosocial profile of adult participants in running and racquetball

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Snyder, E. E.
  Author Spreitzer, E.
  Author Hou, C.
JOURNAL:
  Journal of Sport Behavior (JSB), 4(4), 186 - 201.
YEAR: 1981
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): Social-psychology; adult; participation; comparative-study; running; racquetball; survey; attitude
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=109475&title=109475
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-343-249 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:12 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to develop a comparative profile of the participants in running and racquetball. A questionnaire survey showed that athletes in both sports were similar in age and education, previous involvement in sport, attitudes toward sport, orientation toward work and leisure, and commitment to physical fitness. Runners viewed themselves as less athletic but in better physical condition. Racquetball players were more competitive and considered the social side of sport as more attractive. Develops a comparative psychosocial profile of adult participants in running and racquetball. Collected data through questionnaires which measured attitudes toward sport, orientation toward work and leisure, interest in health and physical fitness and general life satisfaction. Results indicated similarities in age, education, spectator involvement, previous sport involvement, number of hours involved, attitude toward sport, work and leisure orientation and commitment to physical fitness. Runners viewed themselves as less athletic but in better physical condition, whereas racquetball players were more competitive and were involved for social reasons.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   2 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   2/221 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.