getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Expert-novice differences in performance skills and problem representations of youth and adults during tennis competition

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author McPherson, S. L. (Western Carolina University)
JOURNAL:
  Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), 70(3), 233 - 251.
YEAR: 1999
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): athlete; novice-athlete; tennis; child; adolescent; young-adult; problem-solving; motor-skill; knowledge-level; human-information-processing; comparative-study
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=S-271004&title=S-271004
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-342-568 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:09 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Expert and novice tennis players selected from three different age groups (i.e., 10-11 years, 12-13 years, and collegiate adults) were examined for differences in performance skills (i.e., behavioral analyses of video recordings) and problem representations (i.e., verbal report analyses of tape recordings) during matched competition. Factorial analyses of variance on behavioral measures indicated that experts' performances exhibited higher levels of decision and execution than novices, regardless of age. Kruskal-Wallis tests on verbal report measures indicated that experts generated more total, varied, and sophisticated condition and action concepts than novices. Within experts, adults accessed more sophisticated problem representations than youth. Both current event and action plan profiles guided and mediated adult experts; response selections and executions, respectively. Youth experts primarily used action plan profiles to guide their response selections. Novices, regardless of age, accessed weak problem representations.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations   1 
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/282 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.