getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Individual differences, perceived task characteristics, and preferences for teaching and coaching

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Chelladurai, P. (The Ohio State University Columbus)
  Author Kuga, D. J. (Pennsylvania State University Beaver)
  Author O'Bryant, C. P.
JOURNAL:
  Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), 70(2), 179 - 189.
YEAR: 1999
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): teaching; coaching; preference; factor-analysis; sex-factor; young-adult; individual-difference; task-analysis; perception; sex-role; profession; selection
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=S-270996&title=S-270996
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-342-550 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:09 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
One hundred ninety-two undergraduate physical education students participated in this study of the influence of individual differences, group, and task factors on respondents' preferences for teaching or coaching. The individual difference factors were gender, managerial potential (Gough, 1984), and sex role attributes (Spence & Helmreich, 1986). The group and task differences were measured by a specially developed scale that was factor analyzed to yield six factors: job status, job significance, job variety and control, job identity, ease of discipline, ease of motivation. Subgroup analyses showed that men preferred more to coach than women did, and women preferred more to teach than men did. Men and women perceived greater job variety in coaching and greater control in teaching. The genders did not differ in managerial motivation or in any of the other perceived characteristics of the teaching and coaching roles. Finally, preference for teaching or coaching was influenced by gender, perceived ease of motivating students and athletes, and perceived job variety. These results were discussed in relation to existing literature, and future research directions are identified.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   6/540 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.