getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Janelle, C. M. (University of Florida)
  Author Barba, D. A.
  Author Frehlich, S. G.
  Author Tennant, L. K. (State University of West Georgia)
  Author Cauraugh, J. H. (University of Florida)
JOURNAL:
  Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), 68(4), 269 - 279.
YEAR: 1997
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): achievement; skill; visual-feedback; laterality; young-adult; man; woman; knowledge-of-results; comparative-study
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=454545&title=454545
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-342-463 (Last edited on 2002/05/11 13:37:47 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
This study was designed to examine whether participants who could control the schedule of performance feedback (KP) would learn differentially from those who received a rigid feedback schedule while learning a complex task. Participants (N = 48) were randomly assigned to self-controlled KP (SELF), summary KP (SUMMARY), yoked control (YOKE), or knowledge of results only (KR) conditions. Data collection consisted of an acquisition phase and a 4-day retention phase during which right-handed participants performed a left-handed ball throw. Overall, throwing form improved across trial blocks during acquisition, with the SUMMARY, SELF, and YOKE groups showing more improvement than the KR group. During retention, the SELF group retained a higher level of throwing form and accuracy in comparison to the other groups. Results suggest that when given the opportunity to control the feedback environment, learners require relatively less feedback to acquire skills and retain those skills at a level equivalent to or surpassing those who are given more feedback but receive it passively.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   6/451 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.