getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Attentional strategy use by experienced distance runners: physiological and psychological effects

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Smith, A. L. (Guilford College)
  Author Gill, D. L. (University of North Carolina Greensboro)
  Author Crews, D. J. (Arizona State University)
  Author Hopewell, R.
  Author Morgan, D. W.
JOURNAL:
  Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), 66(2), 142 - 150.
YEAR: 1995
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): distance-running; energy-expenditure; strategy; endurance; relaxation
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=379012&title=379012
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-342-370 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:08 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this investigation was twofold: (a) to compare most and least economical runners on use of attentional strategies and (b) to determine whether the least economical runners within the subject sample could improve running economy (RE) with the use of an active associative (relaxation) attentional strategy. Subjects (N=36) completed an initial assessment of attentional style and RE; then the 12 least economical runners ran in each of three laboratory sessions using control, passive associative, and active associative attentional strategies. Results showed that the most economical and least economical runners did not differ in associative style use. The most economical runners, however, reported less dissociation use and more use of relaxation than did the least economical runners. No significant physiological or psychological changes were associated with any of the three attentional strategy conditions. The findings are related to possible differences in how most and least economical runners use associative strategies.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   3/781 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.