getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Effects of traditional and reversed bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Cauraugh, J. H. (University of Florida)
  Author Chen, D.
  Author Radio, S. J.
JOURNAL:
  Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), 64(4), 413 - 417.
YEAR: 1993
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): knowledge-of-results; motor-skill; learning; time-factor
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=343929&title=343929
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-342-241 (Last edited on 2002/03/07 17:32:57 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The effects of two types of bandwidth (BW) knowledge of results (KR) were investigated on the acquisition and immediate retention of a timing task. Traditional and reversed BW KR groups were compared with two yoked control groups. Forty-eight randomly assigned subjects completed 60 acquisition trials and 20 no-KR retention trials. Acquisition analysis indicated a greater timing accuracy for the traditional BW group in comparison to the reversed BW group. During retention, less absolute constant error was found for both BW groups than for their yoked controls. Absolute performance changes were analyzed to further differentiate the contributions of quantitive and qualitative KR available in both types of BW conditions. This analysis revealed a significant KR x Trial Type interaction. Reliable changes in performance were observed after quantitative trials for the traditional BW group, whereas for the reversed BW group, reliable changes were observed after qualitative trials. This reversed BW group finding, along with the retention accuracy findings, indicated that the qualitative information was used to learn the timing task.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   4/273 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.