getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

On the generality of the 'sit and reach' test: an analysis of flexibility data for an aging population

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Shephard, R. J. (University of Texas at Arlington)
  Author Berridge, M.
  Author Montelpare, W.
JOURNAL:
  Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), 61(4), 326 - 330.
YEAR: 1990
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): flexibility; aging; test-reliability; goniometry; comparative-study
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=267134&title=267134
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-342-089 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:08 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
Head rotation, shoulder extension and rotation, ankle plantar and dorsiflexion, hip flexion, and sit and reach (SR) scores were examined in 41 women and 39 men, aged 45-75 years. The SR gave more reproducible data than the other measurements (intraclass test/retest correlation over 8 months, r = .83). SR scores were independent of standing height (r2 = .068) but were greater in women (p is less than .002). The flexibility at all joints was less than reported for young adults. There were age-related decreases of flexibility scores for the head and shoulder joints (p is less than .01), with a paralles trend for ankle plantar flexion and SR scores (the last only after inclusion of an age-gender interaction term). A principal components analysis identified three factors (tentatively indentified as general trunk, ankle, and shoulder flexibility) accounting for 55.9 percent of total variance. SR scores had a moderate correlation with the first factor (r = .61) but only weak correlations with the second and third. Although the SR test is the most reliable simple instrument, it provides only limited information about the flexibility at other joints in an older population.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   4/350 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.