getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

Evaluation of explosive strength for young and adult athletes

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Viitasalo, J. T. (Research Institute for Olympic Sports / KIHU)
JOURNAL:
  Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), 59(1), 9 - 13.
YEAR: 1988
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): child; adolescent; young-adult; explosiveness; comparative-study; evaluation; vertical-jump; strength; volleyball; hockey; orienteering; skiing; wrestling; gymnastics; basketball; track-and-field; throwing
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=220990&title=220990
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-341-972 (Last edited on 2002/04/09 20:12:46 GMT-6)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The explosive strengths of 361 young and 10 adult male athletes were evaluated by a vertical jumping and a ball-throwing test. The young athletes were representing seven different sports events: track and field, apparatus gymnastics, basketball, ice hockey, orienteering, skiing, and wrestling. The adult subjects were volleyball players. Weighted vertical counter-movement jumps were performed on a platform connected to an electronic unit which calculated the height of the rise of the body's center of gravity. For the stationary ball throwing test, horizontal throwing velocity was measured for balls of different masses by an electrical apparatus. Interevent differences in reliability were minor in the throwing test while, in the jumping test, apparatus gymnasts achieved the most reliable results and the wrestlers the least reliable results. The reliabilities for throwing lighter objects and jumping with lighter loads were better than for the heavier objects and loads, as measured by the coefficient of variation. The results of the new jumping and throwing tests showed rather high correlations as compared with the respective traditional field tests.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   5/527 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2006 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.