getCITED   
  Home     Search     Add Content     Reports     Help  
Edit Publication | Edit Contributors | Delete Publication | Edit References | Edit Citations
Add to Bookstack | Show Bookstack | Change Bookstack

A comparison of heart rate responses in females by player position in standard and zoneless ringette

Post a Comment
CONTRIBUTORS:
  Author Alexander, M.
  Author Butcher, J. E.
  Author Scanlan, J. M.
JOURNAL:
  Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQES), 59(1), 42 - 49.
YEAR: 1988
PUB TYPE: Journal Article
SUBJECT(S): heart-rate; woman; energy-expenditure; ringette; comparative-study; physiology; team-position
DISCIPLINE: No discipline assigned
HTTP: https://secure.sportquest.com/su.cfm?articleno=220995&title=220995
LANGUAGE: English
PUB ID: 103-341-922 (Last edited on 2002/02/27 18:44:06 US/Mountain)
SPONSOR(S):
 
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between game heart rates by player position during two types of ringette rules: standard rules and experimental rules which did not include zone restrictions. Two hundred twenty-five female ringette players were monitored during regular league and tournament play during the 1985 ringette season. Field measurement of the game heart rates was conducted by use of an EST Sport-Tester heart rate monitor, which recorded the average of each 30 s heart rate profile. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was performed to determine the significance of the difference by player position and rules in the mean peak heart rates for six shifts on the ice, the first three and the last three. There were significant differences between mean peak heart rates for forwards and defenders between standard and zoneless rules, but there were no differences between centers. Significance tests were also conducted by position and age division, and the differences in the heart rates of the defenders were significant in the junior belles (13-14) and belles (15-17) age divisions.
STATISTICS
Click on # to view
 Citations  
 References  
 Comments  
 Quality      0/0.00 
 Interest      0/0.00 
 View(er)s   1/471 
Quality
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Interest
  N/A
High
  7
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2
  1
Low
Prev | Next

    ABOUT getCITED   |    CONTACT US   |    USER INFO   |    PREFERENCES   |    PRIVACY   |    LOG IN   
Comments? Suggestions? Send them to feedback@getCITED.org.

Copyright © 2000-2013 getCITED Inc. All Rights Reserved.